Thursday, 26 March 2009

HAPLESS HARMAN REPEATS BILLION POUND BLUNDER.



HAPLESS HARMAN REPEATS BILLION POUND BLUNDER.

DEPUTE LABOUR LEADER IN DENIAL OVER DAMAGING CUTS

Leader of the House of Commons, Harriet Harman has repeated her denial that the UK Government is set to cut spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern - less than 24 hours after she first made the glaring gaffe.
Standing in for Gordon Brown at PMQs yesterday, Ms Harman flatly denied that spending cuts were planned.

Today (Thursday) at Business Questions, questioned by SNP Treasury spokesperson Stewart Hosie MP, Ms Harman repeated her claim – putting her completely at odds with the comments from the Treasury that £5 billion in cuts are planned.

Speaking after the exchange, Mr Hosie said:
“Labour’s planned spending cuts are on record and indisputable, and for Harriet Harman to repeat her denial is a glaring gaffe.
“Harriet Harman is not kidding anyone with her desperate denials – the facts speak for themselves.

“Despite their political diversity, the governments of Scotland, Northern Ireland and even Labour Ministers in Wales can all see the danger of the Treasury’s planned cuts in the teeth of recession, why on earth can’t Harriet Harman recognise this.


“It would be madness, in the deepest days of the Downing Street depression, at a time when we need to support the economy, to slash spending.

“Labour has no place to hide on this issue and must now get their heads out the sand and oppose these cuts.”

COUNCIL TAX INCREASES UNDER LABOUR WHILST FROZEN IN SCOTLAND.



COUNCIL TAX INCREASES UNDER LABOUR WHILST FROZEN IN SCOTLAND.

Commenting on confirmation today (Thursday) that council tax in England will increase by an average of 3% compared to Scotland where it is frozen, SNP MP for Glasgow East, John Mason, pointed to the difference as an example of how the SNP Government is delivering for Scotland whilst Labour fails south of the border. Estimates based on calculations by CIPFA, the organisation of local government accountants, shows that typical families were paying £726 more in council tax – an increase of 105% - since Labour came to power in 1997.

Commenting Mr Mason said:

“This news highlights Labour's lack of answers when it comes to helping people in these hard economic times. It also stands as an example of how things could have been if Labour were still in power in Scotland.

“Thankfully we have an SNP Government delivering a continued council tax freeze for the people of Scotland. A freeze that will help hard-pressed households keep more of their own money in these uncertain economic times. "Since the SNP came in to Government we have seen council tax frozen after years of increases under Labour. The SNP has confirmed that it will fund a council tax freeze to 2012, with people paying the same in 2012 as they were at the 2007 election.

“This news just shows the benefits voting SNP has brought to people in Scotland and that Labour is out of touch.”

TAX CREDIT DOUBLE WHAMMY FOR LOW PAID.



TAX CREDIT DOUBLE WHAMMY FOR LOW PAID.
WEIR BID SECURES CROSS-PARTY SUPPORT SNP Business and Enterprise spokesperson, Mike Weir MP, has secured cross-party support in a bid to persuade the UK government to revise the threshold for Working Tax Credits (WTC) after warning that low income workers are missing out on the benefit because they have had their hours cut as a result of the recession. The Working Tax Credit (WTC) is intended to “help make work pay” for lower income workers. For people with children and disabled people, WTC is payable if the person works 16 hours or more a week. For others, the threshold is 30 hours a week, however, as a result of the recession many workers have had their hours cut and now face a “double whammy”. Mr Weir has today (Thursday) tabled an EDM on the issues which has already received backing from Labour, Liberal Democrat and SDLP MPs. Mr Weir, the SNP MP for Angus, said: “For low paid workers to lose hours at work and then be punished again by having their Working Tax Credit entitlement withdrawn is clearly a double whammy. “Working Tax Credits are supposed to help make work pay, but clearly the reality of the recession is having an impact on peoples employment and the UK government must look at revising the threshold. "Just like the 10p tax fiasco these ridiculous rules are hammering those on low incomes especially hard, and is further compounded by the recession. Instead of helping the less well off and the vulnerable these ridiculous tax credit rules are punishing them. “The tax credit system is patently not working, and I hope that Ministers can be persuaded to sort it out.”

SIR TIM BERNERS-LEE ADVISES.




SIR TIM BERNERS-LEE ADVISES.
Sir Tim Berners-Lee.


Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the creator of the world wide web, today warned MPs and peers that they should not allow third parties, including commercial companies, to snoop on people's internet browsing.

"We use the internet without a thought that a third party would know what we have just clicked on," Berners-Lee said.

"Yet the webpages people use reveal a huge amount about their lives, loves, hates and fears. This is extremely sensitive information.

"People use the web in a crisis, when wondering whether they have a sexually transmitted disease, or cancer, when wondering if they are homosexual and whether to talk about it … to discuss political views."

He said people "use the internet to inform ourselves as voters in a democracy", adding: "We use the internet to decide what is true and what is not.

"We use the internet for healthcare and social interaction."

He said people would consider using the web in a crisis in a different light if they knew they were being monitored and the data would be shared with a third party such as an advertising company.

"There will be a huge commercial pressure to release this data," he said. "The principle should be that it is not to be collected in the first place."

His remarks at a Westminster roundtable discussion about the commercial use of data on the internet followed trials by BT and a company called Phorm of the monitoring of 30,000 people's internet use in order to deliver targeted advertisements based on users' search interests.

The recent development of behaviour-targeted advertising has alarmed privacy campaigners.

In its simplest form, a single website, such as the online retailer Amazon, will keep a record of which pages a user has visited and show them relevant advertisements the next time they visit.

But privacy concerns arise when records of web activity are shared or sold to other commerical third parties, particularly if they involve a popular search engine such as Google, which stores millions of users' searches.

Lady Miller, the Liberal Democrat peer who convened the meeting, said the age of innocence on the internet was over.

"We must come to terms with the cynical reality that, unless parliament does something about it, business will ride roughshod with internet users' data," she said.

"Our privacy laws are outmoded and unco-ordinated, completely unsuited to the competitive commercial environment that is developing on the internet."

She said the internet was developing so quickly that it was bound to be seen as a goldmine by companies such as Phorm, Google and Microsoft, which she claimed were waiting to get their hands on data to sell it to the highest bidder.

Berners-Lee said personal users could turn to encrypted surfing as a way of protecting their privacy, but warned this would make the process more expensive and slow down the user's computer.

He said there were considerable risks of abuse of such histories of personal internet use, including the selling of personal profiles, using it to determine job applications and insurance premiums, and the danger of criminal predators choosing, stalking and targeting victims.

"The power of this information is so great that the commercial incentive for companies or individuals to misuse it will be huge," he said. "It is absolutely essential to have absolute clarity that it is illegal."

He was backed by Dame Wendy Hall, a Southampton University professor of computer science, who appealed to politicians to protect the privacy of people's digital lives and take the issue seriously.

"There are lots of good reasons why companies and government want access to our data but there are huge downsides to that," she said.

"This debate is about our digital lives. It is about who we are, what we are interested in and what is private to us."
story from the Gaurdian U.K.