Monday, 8 March 2010

QUESTIONS LABOUR MUST ANSWER AMID BY-ELECTION AND BLACKMAIL CLAIMS





QUESTIONS LABOUR MUST ANSWER AMID BY-ELECTION AND BLACKMAIL CLAIMS

MASON CALLS FOR FULL DISCLOSURE AND FINANCE PROBE

Glasgow East MP John Mason has today called for full disclosure from
the Labour Party amid the extremely serious issues raised by the
latest revelations following the resignation of Steven Purcell as
Glasgow City Council leader and as an elected councillor.

Following revelations in today’s newspapers that, not only was Mr
Purcell warned by senior police officers that he was at risk of
blackmail, but that he was prevented by Labour from becoming the
party’s candidate in the Glasgow East by-election as a result of
similar concerns, Mr Mason, who won the 2008 by-election contest for
the SNP, has called on Labour to answer the outstanding questions and
for public spending watchdogs to consider an inquiry into the city’s
finances.

Mr Mason said:

“The events of recent days are a personal tragedy for Steven Purcell,
and I wish him well in his recovery. But that personal tragedy cannot
and must not be allowed to deflect attention from the serious
questions the Labour Party must now answer at local, Scottish and UK
level.

“The revelations in the weekend press take matters well beyond Mr
Purcell’s personal circumstances and difficulties. It is now being
suggested that people in the Labour Party knew of the problems that Mr
Purcell had in his personal life, and that concerns these issues could
have surfaced stopped him from becoming the party’s candidate in the
Glasgow East by-election in 2008 – decisions which would have gone
right to the very top of the Labour Party.

“We need to know if this is true, and if so, who knew what and when.
If it is true, then why did the Labour Party consider it unacceptable
for him to be a Westminster by-election candidate, but acceptable for
him to continue to run the country’s biggest local authority and its
huge budgets.

“The Labour Party have to confirm or deny whether a decision to
prevent him standing in Glasgow East was because he could have been
open to blackmail.

“In relation to the visit of senior police officers to Mr Purcell, we
need to know who are the people who are suggested as having applied
pressure to him in terms of possible blackmail threats – and
crucially, has this had any impact on public policy in the City of
Glasgow? Given the massive budgets managed by the City Council, there
is now a clear case for Audit Scotland carrying out a thorough
investigation in light of the events of recent days.

“The people of Glasgow, and Scotland as a whole, deserve to know the
full facts.”

No comments: